Skip to content

Simplify CODEOWNERS #2864

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Simplify CODEOWNERS #2864

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

RickWinter
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 5, 2025 16:53
@RickWinter RickWinter requested review from ronniegeraghty and a team as code owners August 5, 2025 16:53
@RickWinter RickWinter changed the title Simplier maintance for CodeOwner Simplier CodeOwner Aug 5, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR simplifies maintenance of the CODEOWNERS file by replacing individual user handles with a GitHub team for most code ownership entries. The primary purpose is to streamline code review assignments and reduce the need to manually update individual maintainer lists.

  • Replaces individual maintainer handles with @Azure/azure-sdk-rust-dev team across most entries
  • Maintains specific individual owners for certain specialized areas (e.g., storage, identity)
  • Preserves existing team-based ownership for engineering systems

@ronniegeraghty
Copy link
Member

@RickWinter, looks like the team alias isn't valid. Are all the org memberships public?

@heaths heaths changed the title Simplier CodeOwner Simplify CODEOWNERS Aug 5, 2025
Copy link
Member

@heaths heaths left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The group has to be valid. Work with EngSys to define it.

@RickWinter
Copy link
Member Author

The group has to be valid. Work with EngSys to define it.

It is valid. I believe it might just be replication delay.

@@ -68,12 +68,12 @@
# ServiceOwner: @Azure/azure-sdk-write-keyvault
# ServiceLabel: %KeyVault
# PRLabel: %KeyVault
/sdk/keyvault/ @Azure/azure-sdk-write-keyvault @heaths
/sdk/keyvault/ @Azure/azure-sdk-write-keyvault @Azure/azure-sdk-rust-dev
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is overkill. I wanted to stay on here because I have traditionally owned it and using it as a sort of test for core changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants